ORM and the Environment: Environmental Reputation for Oil and Gas Companies

Although the title may be a bit confusing, today’s juncture serves as the perfect opportunity for us at ReputationDefender to establish the evident link between online reputation and environmentalism. Do a company’s polluting emissions harm its reputation? Many people would actually agree upon it, arguing that both customers and suppliers are less likely to do business with organizations that overlook the importance of being environmentally responsible. Many years ago, perhaps a decade, a research carried out in 2005 presented compelling evidence that dictated otherwise: the only adverse consequence suffered by companies that would disregard the importance of environmental regulation was the legal penalty and the costs commonly associated with cleanup and compliance.

But this is 2017: a massive iceberg just broke off from Antarctica and is drifting out to the sea. Things have changed environmentally speaking, and even though conventional wisdom would dictate that customers and suppliers will never punish companies for their emissions through the marketplace, the reality is in fact diametrically opposed. Today, adopting a leaner and greener standpoint has a tremendous impact on a company’s online reputation; today, it is not nonsensical to see individuals preferring not to do business with brands or companies that do not comply with today’s environmental recommendations. In fact, some people are reluctant to work for one of these companies, and even some suppliers disregard the possibility of selling their goods to polluters. Thus, it is clear that disregarding the impact today’s green trend has on a company’s online reputation does more harm than good: polluters will end up facing lower revenues and, eventually, higher costs and overhead. And it just snowballs from there: lower profits prevent companies from starting a proper online reputation strategy and complying with environmental regulations to remedy such situation, causing what is called a «reputational penalty».

It is undeniable that today’s digital era runs on different trends; however, given the fact that trends tend to die inexorably, raising awareness about climate change is not only a must but something positive for a brand. Companies doing businesses today should strive to demonstrate an original and genuine concern for the environment or suffer the consequences a negative online and corporate reputation can bestow upon them. Today’s world is full of multinational companies that live under constant evaluation, and such evaluation is not as intense as in the hydrocarbon industry: oil and gas companies.

Today’s juncture suggests that when it comes to addressing oil and gas companies, the first thing to assess is their environmental practices, as they must always be second to none; however, it is arguably questionable that today’s rising antagonism around these companies means that they can do much better. Oil and gas companies can, and actually need to, do a better job at convincing their audience and people in general that they are not just trying to remedy the consequences of constantly being under such evaluation; that they are not merely responding to the glare of such accusing spotlight.

Oil and gas companies, just like most everyone else on this planet, ought to show genuine concern about safeguarding and protecting the environment for future generations and their own; nonetheless, it is also important to point out, quite rightly by the way, that the term environmentalist has been entirely deformed by those with more radical and extreme points of view. In that sense, it is quite obvious that it is almost impossible to convince all of the earth’s environmentalists and green trends advocates; however, the basic idea is to reach out to the widest possible audience conveying a compelling message about being environmentally friendly.

Image courtesy of Pixabay at Pexels.com

When it comes to improving a company’s online reputation, especially if it is not as good as one might expect, the only possible way to achieve it is by going the extra mile; and taking that extra step that is found beyond the boundaries of that is usually expected from organizations: going beyond the law and regulations. And this is quite important: in the past, companies that were practically forced to comply with environmental regulations were highly open to falling victim of the media should anything bad happened, which caused them to assume a defensive stance—basically the worst case scenario when it comes to strengthening online reputation management.

In that sense, it is way better for oil and gas companies to show a proactive stance instead of always starting a feud with the press: public perceptions, irrespective of whether they are accurate or not, represent public perceptions, and, subsequently, they create regulations. Online Reputation Management is key for every company and every industry, thus, given the fact that it is affected by what the audience perceives as positive—which is true in this case—, embracing today’s environmental trend will not only be beneficial for a company’s ORM strategy but also will provide additional monetary benefits.

* Featured Image courtesy of Pixabay at Pexels.com

Please follow and like us:

Why has the drone industry such a bad online reputation?

The more disruptive the technological advances in our society, the more involved are their online reputation. This has happened to the steam engine, nuclear power, the Internet, and it has also happened to the drones during the current decade. When we talk about drones, it is impossible not to think about Star Wars and those epic battles waged by armies of machines, but in reality, the drones are not simply reduced to their military use. In fact, these unmanned machines have been particularly useful in rescuing lost or seriously injured hikers in hard-to-reach areas, as well as in the control of destructive forest fires, and in data collection in nuclear accidents, such as Fukushima, a few years ago. These are some of the thousands of non-military uses of drones, however, no matter how incredible they are, the public is not able to dissociate these remote-controlled crafts from the well-known images of bombings in Iraq or Syria, as well as the espionage activities for war. This is one of the main reasons for the bad online reputation of this industry.

So far, most drones for civilian use are small and – apparently – inoffensive. Although most were built for recreational use by buyers, many of them are used daily for data collection (for example, to measure the boundaries of an extensive property, to measure glacier displacement, to observe volcanic activity, among others.) But despite the technological advantages offered by drones, the market for these products has not been exploited to its full potential, and this is due to the unfavorable opinions of many people on the Internet about the risks to public safety, and the ease with which privacy (both physical and online) can be affected.

Media scandals are common. DJI, the world’s leading drone manufacturer, has been embroiled in an online reputation crisis due to a computer security breach. Because, among other reasons, some terrorist groups have been using drones from this company to execute their actions of espionage and bombing, DJI has taken control measures. Since this year, this Chinese company has developed a software update that forces users to indicate the geographical areas that they want to fly before using the drones; also, it checks the location of users and constantly downloads forbidden zones of flight. In case a user does not download the updates, the drone does not fly more than 164 feet away, or 98 feet in height, nor is it possible to do direct streaming.

Read also: Reconstructing a corporate Online Reputation, by ReputationDefender

This was partly due to the pressure from the authorities of several countries to comply with local and international standards. Nevertheless, a software already exists that allows DJI drones to fly through forbidden areas. This software allows you to bypass the height limits and even trick the GPS of DJI drones so that they can fly through airports, war zones, or even military installations. The software confuses the GPS of the drone to make it believe that it is flying over a safe zone, and it even makes it possible to break the limit of five hundred feet of height that DJI imposes to its drones.

The main security issue here lies in three main reasons. The first one is the immense availability of purchase of these drones. Years ago, those were items that only millionaires could afford, and they are now increasingly available to anyone (and that includes sociopaths, of course.) In addition, the great distances that these drones are able to travel without losing connection makes them a war tool difficult to control by the authorities. Finally, the versatility of these machines allows, for example, to drop a homemade bomb, or to take samples of chemical substances with the aim of stealing industrial secrets.

Image courtesy of Jeremy Keith at Flickr.com

Nonetheless, DJI has also been involved in another online reputation crisis, and this time has been due to the bad comments of its own users, especially in our country. Many of them believe that the main motivation for buying the advanced drones of this company is related to the great freedom it represents for them, and they believe that the limitations to the use of these products should come from local laws, rather than the company itself. It is a complicated case regarding who is right: Customers, or those who consider public safety and privacy.

These improvements will never be clean of controversy. Last year, the US army unveiled the production and use of insect-sized drones to carry out espionage activities in enemy territories during the current wars. These drones (some of them, the size of a mosquito,) can take DNA samples, take photos, record audio, and track a person’s location by GPS when getting into clothing or luggage. This can be a powerful weapon, or it can be seen as an Orwellian nightmare.

The problem is that if we compare the safety and privacy cons with the pros drones can offer, forbidding or limiting the use of these devices would mean a technological backwardness that could cost a lot of money and human lives.

Recommended: 9 Incredible Ways Drones Are Overcoming Their Bad Reputation

* Featured Image courtesy of Visual Hunt at Pexels.com

Please follow and like us:

Reconstructing a corporate Online Reputation

We at ReputationDefender have previously stressed the importance of Online Reputation Management within specific industries; however, the truth is that every business and every organization—irrespective of whether it is public or private—ought to pay special attention to this issue, especially under today’s fast-paced and rapidly changing juncture. 

Of course, every industry handles its reputation differently, as techniques are often tailored to the industry’s nature, but, when considering today’s landscape as a whole, and given the fact that even governments fail to respond to the financial crisis and its aftermath, a company’s or a business’s online reputation has become increasingly important.

Companies with online reputation problems are more likely to suffer the fallout of public outrage, legislators, and regulatory entities. Moreover, the credibility of the public sector as a whole will mark its capability to participate in contentious measures such as protectionism, which, of course, has several implications for today’s worldwide economic landscape.

These premises have not gone unnoticed, and senior executives are more aware than ever of how important and serious this issue—this challenge—is. The vast majority of them acknowledge that some industries and sectors have perhaps dragged others into the realm of pejorative perceptions. It is not a secret that some companies in certain sectors—especially the financial industry—have treated consumers, shareholders, regulators, etc., in the most possible unfairly manner, and thus, this perception seems to have spanned over other industries as well.

This assumption, although eschatological and a bit exaggerated, is backed up with facts: in accordance with a survey of senior executives and C positions carried out in 2016, almost 80% of them asserted that public trust in their businesses has deteriorated. In fact, they also assert that the audience and their customers seem to trust corporations less now than they did in the past. These circumstances, nevertheless, are the consequences of not just the speed, volatility, and unexpectedness of today’s economy, but also of several changes within the reputation environment that were not acknowledged in time by companies and industries in general. Those changes include, of course, the evident decline of trust in media and advertising.

So, how to reconstruct a damaged online reputation and, moreover, regain the public’s trust? Now, more than ever before, it will be action-driven strategies the ones responsible for building a solid and strong reputation. 

Organizations and companies, in general, need to improve the way they have been carrying out their engagement with their clients; most businesses actually fail to listen good enough what is happening around them and end up missing the red flags associated with substantial ORM issues; however, all of these can be remedied by adopting and taking actions to reinstate their relationship with their customers, thusly going beyond traditional PR and basic ORM strategies.

By doing this effectively, companies and businesses, in general, will be able to step up their sophistication and their coordination when it comes to developing a solid and reliable online reputation management campaign. As of recent years, some businesses have started to use not only more strict levels of segmentation techniques to understand their customers better but also cross-functional teams to gather and collect enough and precise information so that they can respond much quicker to plausible online reputation threats. This suggests that the existence of barriers within companies is indeed detrimental for the business’s reputation: a bureaucratic culture prevents the organization to react and act against ORM issues; however, one vital aspect to getting past these corporate barriers is a committed senior leadership. From CEOs to the lady at the reception, all employees should strive to achieve the same ORM goal without delegating such responsibility to other people and coworkers. Bear in mind that this, although simple to understand, is what will allow companies cope with today’s no less than energized public. Today is the day when CEOs will finally bolster their reputations of their businesses: it is no less than their sole obligation.

Image courtesy of Miguel Á. Padriñán at Pexels.com

Free markets have dispersed the economic spectrum, which is why companies ought to pay special attention to the way they collect information about possible ORM threats and the way they analyze it. It is not a secret that the key to not falling victim of an ORM debacle is by acting soon before it happens and by taking the necessary actions to mitigate it. Some would still wonder, is it possible for companies to do that just by themselves? Well, developing alliances with new partners is not something nonsensical: governments, consumers, and other groups are highly important when it comes to listening to what is happening, which, of course, is the only way to develop preventive measures. It, however, demands higher levels of coordination. Levels that can be achieved by getting past corporate barriers and the dreary bureaucratic culture that prevents companies, organizations, institutions, and businesses from doing so.

* Featured Image courtesy of Unsplash at Pexels.com

Please follow and like us:

ORM for some of the most hated businessmen in the world

Jack Ma, the richest man in China, once said that if you have a million dollars in your bank account that money is indeed entirely yours, but if you have more than a billion dollars, what you actually have in your account is the trust of the people, because what you do with that money will inevitably have social impacts. Not all entrepreneurs think like Ma. In fact, some profess a diametrically opposed thinking, and the increasing of their fortunes grows with the hatred that millions of people feel towards them on the Internet. This makes them, in addition to politicians, some of the worst online reputed characters in the world since most people blame them for many of the ills of today’s global society.

Let’s look at some of these unpopular characters.

Read also: Online Reputation Management: A must for the powerful, by ReputationDefender

George Soros

George Soros is a Jewish-Hungarian tycoon and a financial speculator. He is known for being the man behind the bankruptcy of the Bank of England in the early 1990s, an episode of which Soros made a profit of about $ 1 billion and produced losses to the English state amounting to about $ 3.4 billion. Soros is one of the richest people in the world. His fortune is about $ 24.2 billion according to Forbes.

He is hated in the Jewish world because of his dark past with the Nazi regime. When he was only fourteen years old, and the Germans invaded Hungary, he and his family collaborated with them to strip the Jews of their properties and thus send them to extermination camps while he posed as an average Christian kid. However, Soros is hated for much more than that. In addition to speculation and his opinions about not extending the lives of ‘useless people,’ Soros finances thousands of NGOs willing to politically counter the interests of organizations, people, and parties opposed to his beliefs, like drug legalization, abortion and the reduction of human population.

The interesting thing is that George Soros is not moved by his bad online reputation whatsoever.

Martin Shkreli

Martin Shkreli is known around the world as one of the most hated men in the United States. This drugmaker of Albanian and Croatian origin has been the target of several criticisms after buying the exclusive license to manufacture an anti-AIDS drug. Shkreli decided to raise the price of the medication to $ 750, which is a price that thousands of people can’t afford. Such increase unleashed a tremendous wave of disgust in the social media which eventually made him explain to the US Congress itself about his decisions.

Shkreli was charged with fraud in 2015, and his trial has begun this very week. The charges against him are, in particular, securities fraud, electronic fraud, and conspiracy to deceive several investors by more than $ 11 million during six years.

However, this entrepreneur seems to feel no regret for his actions. Although he has agreed to lower the price of the medication, he often broadcasts videos from his YouTube channel where he mocks his haters and occasionally talks to them over the phone. In fact, he is so detested, that even he opened an auction so that the winner could punch him in the face. Ironically, the proceeds went to research for cancer treatments.

Edward S. Lampert

According to 24/7 Wall St., Mr. Lampert is the number one most detested CEO in America. In fact, a very low percentage of Kmart and Sears combined feel some form of admiration for him. The reason for such a bad online reputation? Massive layoffs and unpaid wages to many of his employees. Like many entrepreneurs, Lampert’s logic is based on the premise that it is necessary to reduce costs, even if this involves dismissing big numbers of workers. Nonetheless, he is not only hated by the workers of both large companies, but by the shareholders, who have almost no confidence in Lampert’s executive decisions, to the point that the stock price of both companies has had considerable losses during the recent years.

What most draws the attention is his income. In theory, Lampert earns one dollar every month, although the compensation he receives during each year amounts to millions of dollars in total.

From some of his interviews, it can be concluded that Lampert is not worried about his bad image on the Internet mainly because he considers that both his ideas and his actions are correct.

Image courtesy of ValueWalk at Flickr.com

It seems that the indifference to bad online reputation is a common denominator among the most hated entrepreneurs in the world. Great tycoons like the recently deceased David Rockefeller seem to rely more on their financial powers than on the approval of the masses. The problem is that no one knows when a good online reputation will be necessary. Years ago, when Donald Trump was a hated businessman, the online reputation needed to build a strong political campaign seemed not to be one of his priorities, and now his critics use his negative old information to feed the hatred of large sectors of the American society against him.

* Featured Image courtesy of International Monetary Fund – Michael Spilotro at Flickr.com

Please follow and like us: